There are three such tools: the plain language summaries (PLS), Blogshots, and updated Wikipedia pages through the Cochrane-Wikipedia partnership.
![structured interview transcripts + word + nvivo 12 structured interview transcripts + word + nvivo 12](https://s3.amazonaws.com/libapps/accounts/41130/images/Screen_Shot_2015-10-27_at_10.26.19_AM.png)
Cochrane has addressed these usability concerns by developing several consumer-orientated KT tools. Despite Cochrane systematic reviews being regarded as providing the highest quality evidence to make informed choices about health care treatment they are often inaccessible and impenetrable to parents and familial caregivers. In recent years, Cochrane initiatives have aimed to address this need by developing quality KT tools that are available to consumers over Web. However, with such a wide range of information available over Web, the quality of health information is often mixed and inaccurate. Health information on the internet is used in a multitude of ways, including as a second opinion, to determine when to access care, and to inform lifestyle changes. As a result, internet KT tools have emerged as a popular source to fill the public demand for understandable, accessible health care knowledge, with 69% of Canadians reporting using the internet for health-related information. Although iterative design has been readily adopted into the KT research, comparative usability analysis remains unused in the broader usability field.ĭespite usability importance and integration, many KT tools remain complicated and inaccessible to parents and caregivers, creating a drought of understandable knowledge on many topics. Doing such work early in design provides an opportunity to create an end product using the best features from each tool and to better understand the underlying concepts leading to end users’ preferences for a specific product. Allowing participants to see multiple designs allows them to provide comparative feedback and identify specific areas they like or dislike about a product. In comparative usability analysis, several prototypes or competing products are compared with one another to identify strengths and weaknesses between the products. Comparative usability analysis offers another method of assessing the usability of a product. Through this method, KT tools are developed, evaluated, redesigned, and reevaluated based on feedback from the end user. At the center of improving usability is field testing and iterative design, which has been adopted by the KT field to develop more user-centered tools for consumers. Usability aims to develop tools that provide relevant information in a satisfying, effective, and efficient way to the target end user.
STRUCTURED INTERVIEW TRANSCRIPTS + WORD + NVIVO 12 SOFTWARE
Usability is a concept developed in the software and Web design industry that is increasingly being applied to KT tools to systematically address factors limiting a KT tool from meeting the needs of its audience. Although many previous attempts have been made to create more user-friendly KT tools, finding a method of realizing this goal has been a persistent difficulty in the child health field. Although we know connecting parents and caregivers to research evidence has the power to improve health decision making and appropriate access of health care services, traditional KT tools directed at health care professionals remain too complex for parents to effectively utilize. Owing to the unique needs of pediatric patients, Cochrane Child Health aims to develop parent- and guardian-directed KT tools to meet their needs.
![structured interview transcripts + word + nvivo 12 structured interview transcripts + word + nvivo 12](https://www.rev.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/analyze-transcripts-qualitative-research.jpg)
Cochrane Child Health seeks to facilitate the uptake of evidence and evidence-informed decisions by key knowledge users (clinicians, patients, parents, and policy makers) and other stakeholders (eg, health system organizations such as Alberta Health Services) through the development and dissemination of a variety of engaging KT tools. Impactful KT goes beyond dissemination, and involves engagement, participation, and evaluation by knowledge users. Knowledge translation (KT) offers a solution to this problem through raising awareness of evidence and facilitating its use.
![structured interview transcripts + word + nvivo 12 structured interview transcripts + word + nvivo 12](https://i1.rgstatic.net/publication/328239156_Haven_Sharing_receptive_music_listening_to_foster_connections_and_wellbeing_for_people_with_dementia_who_are_nearing_the_end_of_life_and_those_who_care_for_them/links/5c6eaa72a6fdcc360a7499f1/largepreview.png)
The impact of health research is often minimized by ineffective communication and utilization.